Français: această pagină nu e încă tradusă. Textul de mai jos e în English.
The cost of fixing a security defect grows with every phase: trivial in a design meeting, expensive in a sprint, painful after launch, potentially catastrophic in production. Yet in most projects security appears at the end, as a test that “needs to pass”. We move it to the beginning and throughout the project — “shift-left” — with clear checkpoints, so a new system doesn’t become next year’s incident.
How we work
We integrate security into the development lifecycle (secure SDLC), following recognised models — OWASP SAMM and ASVS, NIST SSDF:
- Requirements — security and privacy requirements (including data protection by design), abuse cases, compliance obligations; OWASP ASVS as a measurable target, not a vague “secure application”
- Design — architecture review and threat modelling, as a formal gate before build
- Development — secure coding standards (OWASP Top 10), plus scanning integrated into the pipeline: SAST, dependencies (SCA), secrets, IaC
- Testing — DAST, security test cases and penetration testing before launch
- Release and operations — hardening, IaC scanning, patching, monitoring
What you get
- Security requirements specification and a per-project acceptance criterion
- Threat model and design review approval
- Secure coding guides and CI/CD security gate configuration
- Test results (SAST/DAST/SCA/pentest), with remediation tracking
- A security go / no-go assessment for launch